|
Post by James Rhine on Mar 16, 2010 10:32:04 GMT -5
neither of these girls talked with Danielle I'm sure. So they couldn't have been playing a perfect social game. Danielle told me herself that she only talked to three of us: Nathan, Roddy and myself. I wonder if/when we'll hear from her...
|
|
Sarah
Juror
[Mo0:25]
Posts: 384
|
Post by Sarah on Mar 16, 2010 16:47:56 GMT -5
is amy only answering the questions of those jurors she has locked?
|
|
Nathan
Juror
[Mo0:18]
Posts: 299
|
Post by Nathan on Mar 16, 2010 17:33:58 GMT -5
Amy said she's answering them tonight.. I'm waiting to get some answers before I drill them with my questions.
|
|
Sarah
Juror
[Mo0:25]
Posts: 384
|
Post by Sarah on Mar 16, 2010 18:01:24 GMT -5
|
|
|
Post by James Rhine on Mar 16, 2010 19:18:40 GMT -5
I was wondering when we'd hear from you too Nathan.
|
|
Sarah
Juror
[Mo0:25]
Posts: 384
|
Post by Sarah on Mar 17, 2010 18:12:46 GMT -5
God. yeah, so i dont know. Both of them didn't really play much of an impressive game lol. Even Janelle's eviction, I have to say I need to take probably 90% of the credit because it was me who fought hard to change the target from Amy to Janelle. Nak and I spoke about it for so long and I played to her suspicions and issues with Nate/Janelle, which is probably why Janelle ended up being the target.
The other weeks aren't very impressive either. I think Nakomis played a much stronger first half of the game whereas Amy picked up her game at the end... not that it was much of a game at all, but she did more on the second half than the beginning half.
Anyways, I'm still waiting for Amy to answer the questions so I know what the right thing to do is.
|
|
|
Post by James Rhine on Mar 17, 2010 18:34:33 GMT -5
honestly, Nakomis took me out of the game, so I might have to give her my vote solely for that reason. But I also need to read Amy's rhyme.
|
|
Sarah
Juror
[Mo0:25]
Posts: 384
|
Post by Sarah on Mar 17, 2010 18:41:27 GMT -5
LMAO James
|
|
Nathan
Juror
[Mo0:18]
Posts: 299
|
Post by Nathan on Mar 17, 2010 18:49:27 GMT -5
KC, I think you shouldn't accept any votes until Amy answers questions.
|
|
Sarah
Juror
[Mo0:25]
Posts: 384
|
Post by Sarah on Mar 17, 2010 18:50:45 GMT -5
i bet it's because she either wanted you evicted or wanted me evicted
|
|
Nathan
Juror
[Mo0:18]
Posts: 299
|
Post by Nathan on Mar 17, 2010 18:52:20 GMT -5
I wish Nakomis would have told me that. as;lfg;jalskjdf;laskgj;la
If I would have know that little information, I would have gotten Amy out.
|
|
Sarah
Juror
[Mo0:25]
Posts: 384
|
Post by Sarah on Mar 17, 2010 18:54:49 GMT -5
yes well actually, had we known a lot of things, danielle woudn't have been the one evicted the week before I was
|
|
|
Post by James Rhine on Mar 17, 2010 20:20:34 GMT -5
KC, I think you shouldn't accept any votes until Amy answers questions. seriously? I'm sure people can decide themselves when they're ready to vote. lol
|
|
|
Post by Nick on Mar 17, 2010 20:22:50 GMT -5
cookies are nice
|
|
Nathan
Juror
[Mo0:18]
Posts: 299
|
Post by Nathan on Mar 17, 2010 20:30:56 GMT -5
KC, I think you shouldn't accept any votes until Amy answers questions. seriously? I'm sure people can decide themselves when they're ready to vote. lol I see you're a rookie, there's a reason why votes are able to change during the game. You voting now based on hearing 1 person is rubbish, and the way you played your game I expect nothing less of you.
|
|